WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:02.557
You may have noticed that every time I say

00:00:02.557 --> 00:00:04.533
“it’s time for a simpler video”

00:00:04.533 --> 00:00:05.538
it’s a lie.

00:00:06.122 --> 00:00:09.013
For the record, it doesn’t start as a lie

00:00:09.013 --> 00:00:10.000
it’s just…

00:00:10.578 --> 00:00:14.088
well, I start writing the script at the beginning.

00:00:14.088 --> 00:00:16.022
Seems to make sense to do it that way.

00:00:16.022 --> 00:00:17.614
And so, I’ll say

00:00:17.614 --> 00:00:19.133
“ah, this is a simple idea!

00:00:19.133 --> 00:00:20.244
It’ll be simple!

00:00:20.244 --> 00:00:21.249
Simple!”

00:00:21.375 --> 00:00:24.654
and then&nbsp;it just snowballs into a five part series.

00:00:25.040 --> 00:00:26.093
Not today!

00:00:26.093 --> 00:00:28.477
We are just gonna talk about this thing.

00:00:29.120 --> 00:00:32.560
Back when I made the humidifier&nbsp;
video I showed one of these.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:32.560 --> 00:00:34.616
It’s a basic hygrometer.

00:00:34.616 --> 00:00:36.389
It has a dial and a pointy bit

00:00:36.389 --> 00:00:39.064
and what the pointing bit points to is, roughly,

00:00:39.064 --> 00:00:41.568
what the ambient relative humidity&nbsp;is.

00:00:41.568 --> 00:00:42.609
Simple.

00:00:42.609 --> 00:00:44.685
Some of you asked how this works.

00:00:45.280 --> 00:00:48.266
And honestly, yeah that's pretty intriguing,&nbsp;isn’t it?

00:00:48.266 --> 00:00:50.675
It doesn’t take any batteries, and if you look through the back

00:00:50.675 --> 00:00:54.307
you can kind of get a peek at a coil-like thing.

00:00:54.307 --> 00:00:57.035
That looks an awful lot like a bimetallic strip!

00:00:57.280 --> 00:00:59.665
What’s a bimetallic strip, you ask?

00:00:59.665 --> 00:01:02.104
It’s a strip made of two metals.

00:01:02.104 --> 00:01:06.193
That’s useful because different materials&nbsp;
have different thermal expansion properties.

00:01:06.193 --> 00:01:09.127
Virtually everything expands a bit when it gets&nbsp;
warmer,

00:01:09.127 --> 00:01:11.074
and metals are no exception.

00:01:11.074 --> 00:01:15.164
But how much they expand depends on the specific material.

00:01:15.164 --> 00:01:17.744
When you take two metals that are not the same

00:01:17.744 --> 00:01:20.539
and sandwich them together in the form of&nbsp;a strip,

00:01:20.539 --> 00:01:23.576
the mismatch in thermal expansion coefficients between them

00:01:23.576 --> 00:01:27.884
will cause the strip&nbsp;to bend slightly as the temperature changes.

00:01:28.240 --> 00:01:30.739
Bimetallic strips are in all sorts of&nbsp;
places,

00:01:30.739 --> 00:01:32.777
from the world’s greatest toaster,

00:01:32.777 --> 00:01:34.333
to blinking Christmas lights,

00:01:34.333 --> 00:01:36.395
to&nbsp;the thermostat of space heater,

00:01:36.395 --> 00:01:37.462
to, well,

00:01:37.462 --> 00:01:39.203
thermostats in general.

00:01:39.203 --> 00:01:42.435
But&nbsp;a classic and simple application of the bimetallic strip

00:01:42.435 --> 00:01:45.215
is in a thermometer like these.

00:01:45.215 --> 00:01:47.322
And let’s just get it out of our systems,

00:01:47.322 --> 00:01:50.295
yes these numbers are meaningless to many of you&nbsp;out there

00:01:50.295 --> 00:01:54.438
and maybe one day we’ll stop using this temperature scale ‘round these parts

00:01:54.438 --> 00:01:57.888
but I can’t&nbsp;think in Celsius any more than you can think in Fahrenheit

00:01:57.888 --> 00:02:02.850
and besides, a zero to one hundred scale that&nbsp;
correlates well with the range of tolerable ambient temperatures

00:02:02.850 --> 00:02:05.370
is a more pleasing way to do it from my perspective and -

00:02:05.370 --> 00:02:06.973
hold on this is a tangent, now.

00:02:07.455 --> 00:02:08.850
I want to show you something.

00:02:08.850 --> 00:02:09.764
See&nbsp;this?

00:02:09.764 --> 00:02:11.628
This is called a search engine.

00:02:11.628 --> 00:02:13.572
There’s all sorts of them out there these&nbsp;days.

00:02:13.572 --> 00:02:15.405
And most of them let you do this:

00:02:15.760 --> 00:02:17.598
70 f to c.

00:02:17.598 --> 00:02:18.396
Blam.

00:02:18.396 --> 00:02:19.267
There it is.

00:02:19.267 --> 00:02:20.746
You have a&nbsp;smartphone, right?

00:02:20.746 --> 00:02:24.094
It probably has a search bar in a very convenient place.

00:02:24.094 --> 00:02:26.223
Oh and maybe you&nbsp;even have a voice assistant

00:02:26.223 --> 00:02:31.034
you can literally just ask what whatever temperature is in whatever other&nbsp;scale you like better.

00:02:31.034 --> 00:02:33.003
It really is that easy.

00:02:33.600 --> 00:02:34.945
Now, when it's appropriate,

00:02:34.945 --> 00:02:37.895
I’ll continue to provide conversions&nbsp;here on this YouTube channel

00:02:37.895 --> 00:02:39.944
because it would be careless of me not to,

00:02:40.118 --> 00:02:43.893
but&nbsp;when I dare to offhandedly tweet something

00:02:43.893 --> 00:02:46.154
and use one of our silly units

00:02:46.154 --> 00:02:47.385
I don’t wanna hear it.

00:02:47.385 --> 00:02:51.006
You’ll spend way more time composing your complaint to me

00:02:51.006 --> 00:02:54.108
than you&nbsp;will just googling the conversion yourself.

00:02:54.108 --> 00:02:58.424
We are all very aware of how silly the aversion&nbsp;
to the metric system is

00:02:58.424 --> 00:02:59.820
but we can’t help it.

00:03:00.240 --> 00:03:01.691
Oh, and yes I am on Twitter.

00:03:01.691 --> 00:03:03.454
It’s mostly puns&nbsp;and other dad jokes.

00:03:03.454 --> 00:03:05.294
And snark like this!

00:03:05.920 --> 00:03:07.715
OK, let’s get back on track.

00:03:07.715 --> 00:03:10.560
In a thermometer&nbsp;like this, the bimetallic strip

00:03:10.560 --> 00:03:14.498
is formed into a coil with the outside end secured in place

00:03:14.498 --> 00:03:17.771
and&nbsp;the inner part of the coil attached to a pointer.

00:03:17.771 --> 00:03:21.945
Although the amount the strip bends&nbsp;
when the temperature changes is slight,

00:03:21.945 --> 00:03:25.453
forming a coil compounds that&nbsp;effect with each rotation.

00:03:25.453 --> 00:03:28.427
You end up with a coil that contracts as it&nbsp;
gets colder,

00:03:28.427 --> 00:03:30.238
and expands as it gets warmer.

00:03:30.238 --> 00:03:32.021
Or potentially vise versa.

00:03:32.021 --> 00:03:36.720
And so, the center of that coil&nbsp;rotates somewhat as the temperature changes.

00:03:37.360 --> 00:03:39.804
Attach a pointer to the center of that coil,

00:03:39.804 --> 00:03:42.028
and with a little experimentation and calibration

00:03:42.028 --> 00:03:46.184
you’ll have created a simple device&nbsp;
which indicates the current temperature.

00:03:46.184 --> 00:03:48.341
The effect is surprisingly linear.

00:03:48.341 --> 00:03:51.835
The&nbsp;spacing between these numbers is consistent through most of the travel,

00:03:51.835 --> 00:03:54.428
although&nbsp;you can see it vary somewhat at the ends.

00:03:54.800 --> 00:03:58.081
So, if we take this thing apart through The Magic of Buying Two of Them

00:03:58.081 --> 00:04:01.880
we see what appears to be two bimetallic strips.

00:04:01.880 --> 00:04:06.333
One for the tiny, mostly useless&nbsp;
thermometer they give as a token gesture,

00:04:06.333 --> 00:04:08.357
and the other for the hygrometer.

00:04:08.357 --> 00:04:12.305
But this one&nbsp;is actually a bimetallic strip tease.

00:04:12.305 --> 00:04:14.575
Sure, it’s essentially the exact same idea,

00:04:14.575 --> 00:04:17.840
but how can&nbsp;two dissimilar metals give you a humidity reading?

00:04:18.640 --> 00:04:19.905
Well, they can’t.

00:04:19.905 --> 00:04:22.695
In fact&nbsp;not bimetallic,

00:04:22.695 --> 00:04:24.578
but it is bimaterial.

00:04:24.578 --> 00:04:27.630
Take a closer look at it and you’ll see that one side of&nbsp;the coil

00:04:27.630 --> 00:04:30.000
appears to be covered in a sort of paper.

00:04:30.400 --> 00:04:32.456
And that’s because it is.

00:04:32.456 --> 00:04:34.152
This style of&nbsp;hygrometer,

00:04:34.152 --> 00:04:37.381
fittingly named the Metal-Paper Coil hygrometer,

00:04:37.381 --> 00:04:41.416
functions identically to that of&nbsp;
a bimetallic thermometer.

00:04:41.416 --> 00:04:46.193
The key difference is that the salt-impregnated paper changes based&nbsp;on humidity.

00:04:46.193 --> 00:04:50.882
This is one of those things that seems puzzling at first but then absolutely&nbsp;obvious once you know it.

00:04:50.882 --> 00:04:54.111
Like, you know what happens to paper on really humid days.

00:04:54.111 --> 00:04:56.049
It gets all&nbsp;floppy and gross.

00:04:56.049 --> 00:04:57.646
Same sort of thing goes on here.

00:04:58.080 --> 00:05:02.560
The paper side of the coil will&nbsp;
deform slightly as humidity increases,

00:05:02.560 --> 00:05:05.341
changing the overall tension on the coil.

00:05:05.341 --> 00:05:07.527
That&nbsp;makes the needle move.

00:05:07.527 --> 00:05:10.979
Watch what happens when I put a bit of water directly on the paper.

00:05:10.979 --> 00:05:15.299
The&nbsp;coil quickly deforms and the needle shoots to “very damp.”

00:05:15.299 --> 00:05:19.482
And here you’ll notice that the&nbsp;scale is very much not linear.

00:05:19.482 --> 00:05:21.359
Low humidities are far apart,

00:05:21.359 --> 00:05:26.080
indicating that the effect of&nbsp;humidity on the paper diminishes as humidity increases.

00:05:26.640 --> 00:05:30.116
And this clock is why I decided to make this&nbsp;
little video.

00:05:30.116 --> 00:05:32.768
I bought it when I bought the other clocks for the last video

00:05:32.768 --> 00:05:34.538
because it&nbsp;would actually be useful to me

00:05:34.538 --> 00:05:36.684
and I had a perfect spot for it outside.

00:05:36.684 --> 00:05:40.448
But as soon&nbsp;as I realized the humidity scale was linear,

00:05:40.448 --> 00:05:42.998
I got suspicious of this thing.

00:05:42.998 --> 00:05:43.903
Sure enough,

00:05:43.903 --> 00:05:45.327
it’s&nbsp;crap.

00:05:45.327 --> 00:05:49.052
It agrees with this one around 50 percent or so,

00:05:49.052 --> 00:05:53.390
but this won’t ever read higher than maybe 80&nbsp;percent?

00:05:53.390 --> 00:05:56.715
This one read 90 and this only read 75.

00:05:57.505 --> 00:05:58.236
No good.

00:05:58.720 --> 00:06:03.173
In fairness, metal-paper coil hygrometers aren’t&nbsp;super accurate to begin with.

00:06:03.173 --> 00:06:06.820
This website I found says they’re only good to about 10%.

00:06:06.820 --> 00:06:10.936
And it’s not like I could&nbsp;expect the hygrometer in a $10 Walmart clock

00:06:10.936 --> 00:06:12.726
to be any decent to begin with.

00:06:12.726 --> 00:06:16.397
But if you ever&nbsp;see a linear scale on a hygrometer like this,

00:06:16.880 --> 00:06:19.472
it’s definitely not one of the better&nbsp;ones.

00:06:19.930 --> 00:06:22.295
OK, well probably not -

00:06:22.295 --> 00:06:25.506
I haven’t yet tested this one at the time of filming.

00:06:25.506 --> 00:06:28.077
I’ll pin a comment with the final verdict.

00:06:28.077 --> 00:06:31.943
This melding of paper and metal isn’t the&nbsp;
only way to go about it, of course.

00:06:31.943 --> 00:06:35.043
In fact, it seems to be a rather new-fangled way to do it,

00:06:35.043 --> 00:06:38.400
presumably&nbsp;it’s just very easy to manufacture inexpensively.

00:06:39.040 --> 00:06:42.152
All you really need to make a hygrometer&nbsp;like this

00:06:42.152 --> 00:06:47.163
is some sort of spring that’s pulling on something else which will deform based&nbsp;on humidity.

00:06:47.163 --> 00:06:52.268
The first hygrometers that worked on this principle used actual human hairs.

00:06:52.268 --> 00:06:54.718
The&nbsp;hair would lengthen with increased humidity,

00:06:54.718 --> 00:06:57.130
reducing tension on a spring or pulley,

00:06:57.130 --> 00:07:00.240
and&nbsp;thus allowing an indicator of some kind to move.

00:07:00.880 --> 00:07:05.120
As it dried out, the opposite occurred and&nbsp;
the indicator moved in the other direction.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:05.760 --> 00:07:10.394
This style of hygrometer is still made, but&nbsp;
it’s a rather specialist sort of thing.

00:07:10.394 --> 00:07:13.339
However, they can be quite accurate when calibrated,

00:07:13.339 --> 00:07:18.610
with&nbsp;one manufacturer claiming accuracy to within one percent at room temperatures!

00:07:18.610 --> 00:07:22.160
However, I found&nbsp;other sources which aren’t quite so optimistic.

00:07:22.880 --> 00:07:26.320
The worst thing about these cheap&nbsp;
hygrometers is their accuracy.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:26.880 --> 00:07:30.160
While the hair-tension method&nbsp;
might be a little bit more accurate,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:30.160 --> 00:07:33.580
it may still not be as accurate as you can be&nbsp;
with other means.

00:07:33.580 --> 00:07:34.661
Other means?

00:07:34.661 --> 00:07:36.092
What other means?

00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:41.093
Well, the humidistats in the humidifiers I showed&nbsp;
you are electronic.

00:07:41.093 --> 00:07:43.929
The actual component that becomes affected by humidity

00:07:43.929 --> 00:07:47.236
is simpler than the circuitry&nbsp;that interacts with it.

00:07:47.236 --> 00:07:52.201
Typically there will be a polymer or salt of some sort that's exposed to air,

00:07:52.201 --> 00:07:54.693
and the electrical resistance of this material

00:07:54.693 --> 00:07:59.031
changes with the moisture absorbed in it and thus&nbsp;the
ambient humidity.

00:07:59.031 --> 00:08:02.137
Measure its resistance, compare that to a lookup table,

00:08:02.137 --> 00:08:05.386
and now you know the&nbsp;relative humidity within a few percentage points.

00:08:05.520 --> 00:08:09.600
These days this rather basic task&nbsp;
can be done at the component level,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:09.600 --> 00:08:14.000
allowing a simple interface between a sensor&nbsp;
and whatever device you’re putting it in.

00:08:14.560 --> 00:08:19.280
There are other techniques involving materials&nbsp;
which exhibit changes in their capacitance,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:19.280 --> 00:08:22.400
but the essence of all of them&nbsp;
is in the material which changes&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:22.400 --> 00:08:25.227
in some way depending on ambient humidity.

00:08:25.227 --> 00:08:27.667
It can be something we measure electrically,

00:08:27.667 --> 00:08:32.419
or it can be something that moves a pointer like&nbsp;
a piece of paper or a human hair.

00:08:32.419 --> 00:08:34.365
What we’ve done with these devices,

00:08:34.365 --> 00:08:35.838
including the thermometers,

00:08:35.838 --> 00:08:38.897
is&nbsp;quite simple but also quite profound.

00:08:38.897 --> 00:08:43.214
Figuring out how environmental conditions affect different&nbsp;
materials

00:08:43.214 --> 00:08:49.884
allowed us to work backwards and define those environmental conditions using the&nbsp;material as a reference.

00:08:49.884 --> 00:08:51.840
Those humans, so clever!

00:08:52.560 --> 00:08:56.326
While it may be more technically impressive to&nbsp;
do that using electronicals

00:08:56.326 --> 00:08:58.932
and hook it up to a microcontroller which can beam

00:08:58.932 --> 00:09:01.440
god-awful&nbsp;blue numbers straight into your retinas,

00:09:02.400 --> 00:09:06.563
that’s just not as satisfying as&nbsp;these simple things.

00:09:06.563 --> 00:09:09.633
Turning the physical properties of something into a,

00:09:09.838 --> 00:09:13.040
well,&nbsp;turning motion is never gonna get old to me.

00:09:13.920 --> 00:09:15.803
I told you it’d be simple!

00:09:15.803 --> 00:09:20.825
Now I’ll have&nbsp;fun looking at the YouTube studio and seeing my watch time metric tank.

00:09:20.825 --> 00:09:21.840
It’ll be great.

00:09:23.760 --> 00:09:28.128
Oh yeah, sorry. No music or&nbsp;
credits today. Just…

00:09:28.128 --> 00:09:28.628
this.

00:09:30.534 --> 00:09:33.330
Take a closer look, and you'll see that one of zah

00:09:33.330 --> 00:09:34.300
elbledebuh be deh.

00:09:34.300 --> 00:09:35.041
plerh

